Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 2010No. D055879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McINTYRE, J.

Otay Land Company and Flat Rock Land Company sued United Enterprises, Inc., United Enterprises, Ltd., and U.E. Limited, L.P. (collectively United), in both federal and state courts for recovery of environmental response costs, damages, and other forms of equitable and statutory relief arising from the operation of a shooting range on property United owned on Otay Mesa between 1956 and 1988 (the underlying actions). Royal Indemnity Company (Royal), United’s insurer for three years beginning in 1966, is defending United under a reservation of rights.

In September 2007, Royal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
  4. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Haskel, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Riddell, Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. MS Amlin Corporate Member, Ltd v. BottiniDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Riddell, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. STATE FARM MUTUAL VS. HANSEN (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  5. STATE FARM MUTUAL VS. HANSEN (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API