Legal Opinion
Riddell, Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 23, 2017No. B275482PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MENETREZ, J.*
*759Riddell, Inc. and other football helmet manufacturers and affiliates (collectively Riddell) are defendants in lawsuits filed by numerous former professional football players alleging personal injuries resulting from their use of Riddell football helmets (the third party actions). Riddell filed suit against numerous insurers (collectively the Insurers) alleging that they owe Riddell a defense and indemnity in the third party actions.1
*760In Riddell's action against the Insurers (the coverage action), the Insurers propounded discovery seeking information relating to prior claims…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Grider v. Keystone Health Plan Central, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Albert v. Truck Ins. Exch., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Albert v. Truck Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Zogenix, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Zogenix, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021