Legal Opinion

Karim-Panahi v. 4000 Massachusetts Apartments

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 27, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-0605Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) PARVIZ KARIM-PANAHI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-cv-00605 (TSC) ) 4000 MASSACHUSETTS ) APARTMENTS et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has sued more than twenty defendants for what appears to be housing discrimination and other alleged wrongs. He has divided the defendants into eight groups, and each group has moved to dismiss under Rules 8 and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons explained below, Defendants’ motions will be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API