Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Partin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1903PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Hall. Tried below before Hon. S. P. Huff.

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Associate Justice.

P. H. Partin, "unnecessarily joined by his wife, instituted this suit to recover damages, the most part for personal injuries received by the latter in consequence of her team becoming frightened at the whistling of one of appellant’s locomotives, causing it to run away and- upset the buggy in which she was riding. The verdict and judgment were for $500, for the personal injuries and $25 for the damages to the buggy and harness.

first assignment presents no error, because the bill of exception taken to the court’s refusal to grant the continuance neither includes the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McMannewitzTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hargis v. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Deacon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Galveston Theatres v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Guinn v. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API