Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Babbidge

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 23, 1969No. 21,628Published

1DissentFerguson, Judge

I dissent.

I had thought, until the advent of this opinion, that one accused of crime had an unqualified right to refuse to give testamentary evidence against himself under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution and Article 31, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 831. However, my brothers now hold this right to be qualified by the need of the Government to perfect its evidence in rebuttal to an accused’s defense of insanity. The door has now been opened to other similar qualifications and I do not perceive how it can be closed short of reversal of this opinion.

The situation which…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API