Legal Opinion

Dockstader v. Hirning

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1926No. File No. 6121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.

This' is a special proceeding in mandamus, brought in the circuit court of Minnehaha county to. compel the superintendent of hanks to certify an alleged deposit in the People’s State Bank of Canova to the depositors’ guaranty fund commission. Hirning had refused to do that upon me ground that the claim was a loan and not a deposit.

Upon the return day to the alternative writ the defendant moved to quash the writ upon the ground that the circuit court of Minnehaha county had no jurisdiction of the person of the defendant or of the subject of the proceeding, and upon the ground that plaintiff’s…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alderman v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Fergen v. LonieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. In re Citizens' State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Lytle v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Dockstader v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API