Legal Opinion

Lytle v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1926No. File Nos. 6259, 6260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.

Appeal No. 6259 is from a judgment directing the superintendent of banks and the depositors’ guaranty fund commission to pay plaintiffs’ claim, as a holder of a certificate of deposit in the State Bank of Winfred out of the moneys in the guaranty fundi. Appeal No. 6260 is from an order denying defendants’ motion to modify the form of the judgment. No question is presented in the brief as to the propriety of the holding of the trial court that plaintiff was a depositor in good faith. *638Upon the question of the modification of the form of the judgment the same points are raised as in Ahearn v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ahearn v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Dockstader v. HirningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Spratt v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Isaacson v. Northern Wholesale Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API