Legal Opinion

Hamborg v. County of Hennepin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1993No. C4-92-2338PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant Randall Hamborg challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent Hennepin County in a tax forfeiture case. Specifically, he challenges the district court's conclusion that the statutory requirement of depositing delinquent taxes prior to litigation is constitutional. He also argues the district court erred in concluding that the county properly served notice of expiration of the redemption period. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1983, appellant Randall Hamborg was the leasing agent for the Muse Ten Center (Center), 230 South Tenth Avenue, Minneapolis,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re TvetenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Franklin v. Hennepin County Department of Property Tax & Public RecordsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Jefferson v. SauersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heikes v. Clay CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Heikes v. Clay CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API