Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Hennepin County Department of Property Tax & Public Records

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1992No. C2-91-2182PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant William Franklin challenges the adequacy of the notice of expiration of his redemption rights in tax forfeitures of property under Minn.Stat. § 281.23 (1988). We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant William Franklin is the owner of various properties in Minneapolis. At issue are two duplexes for which appellant failed to pay real estate taxes during 1985, 1986, and 1987. These properties became subject to forfeiture for taxes in 1988. After appellant defaulted on confessions of judgment on each property, Hennepin County began the forfeiture process, under Minn.Stat. § 281.23…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Wakefield v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. McHardy v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Wirtz v. Bardon Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamborg v. County of HennepinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API