Sacramento Bank v. Pacific Bank
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
Appeal from judgment for plaintiff for the sum of $1,014.38 claimed to he due on the sixth dividend declared in favor of creditors by directors of defendant.
The appeal is taken on the judgment-roll, from which it appears that, when the defendant became insolvent and was placed in liquidation by proceedings of the hank commissioners in 1893, it was indebted to plaintiff in .the sum of $20,272.70 or thereabouts. The plaintiff presented its claim for that amount to the defendant and that defendant in due form allowed the *148same. That from the defendant plaintiff has collected of this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Harmon v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- National Mount Wollaston Bank v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Hiller v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Jewell v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moore v. California State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Brown v. Sheldon State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Dixon v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Michigan Hospital Service v. SharpeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Western Pac. Ry. Co. v. GodfreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.