Legal Opinion

Chunyk & Conley/Quad-C v. Bray

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 9, 2010No. 38391-8-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

¶1 Patricia Bray sustained an industrial injury and the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) awarded her time loss compensation from April 1, 1999 through May 30, 2003. The Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (Board) affirmed, but a jury overturned the Board’s decision in superior court. Bray appeals, assigning error to the jury instructions. She argues that the jury was invited to speculate about whether her work injury caused reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) and depression, even though the parties had stipulated that her injury caused those conditions, and the trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kingery v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kingery v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Abraham v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hubbard v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Birgen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. CHUNYK & CONLEY/QUAD-C v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. King County v. Vinci Construction Grands Projets/Parsons RCI/Frontier-Kemper, JVCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Chunyk & Conley/quad C, V Patti C. BoettgerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API