Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMelnick, J.
¶1 Josette Taylor, individually and in her capacity as the personal representative of the estate of her husband Fred E. Taylor,1 appeals from a jury verdict finding no liability by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISI) under the Washington Tort Reform and Product Liability Act (WPLA),2 for Taylor’s injuries resulting from complications during a robotically assisted prostatectomy.3 Taylor argues that the trial court erred by not instructing the jury that (1) ISI, manufacturer of the system used to perform the surgery, owed a duty to warn the hospital in addition to the *780surgeon, and (2) strict…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- McKee v. American Home Products Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
- Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
- Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017