Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 7, 2015No. 45052-6-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMelnick, J.

¶1 Josette Taylor, individually and in her capacity as the personal representative of the estate of her husband Fred E. Taylor,1 appeals from a jury verdict finding no liability by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISI) under the Washington Tort Reform and Product Liability Act (WPLA),2 for Taylor’s injuries resulting from complications during a robotically assisted prostatectomy.3 Taylor argues that the trial court erred by not instructing the jury that (1) ISI, manufacturer of the system used to perform the surgery, owed a duty to warn the hospital in addition to the *780surgeon, and (2) strict…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. McKee v. American Home Products Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API