Legal Opinion
Mid-Century Insurance v. Hutsel
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1970No. Civ. 9782PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AULT, J.
John F. Hutsel appeals from a declaratory judgment entered against him and in favor of William H. Cousins, Joseph L. Leakes and Mid-Century Insurance Company (Mid-Century).
There is no dispute as to the facts. Hutsel was Cousins’ insurance agent. The previous year he had placed Cousins’ automobile liability insurance ($10,000/$20,000 bodily injury and $5,000 property damage) with Transnational Insurance Company. The policy expired on May 24, 1966. Having undertaken to do so, and having collected a premium therefor, Hutsel negligently failed to procure a new and similar liability…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Bentley v. FayasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by16 opinions
- Saunders v. CarissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman Valentine v. Aetna Insurance Company, Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman Valentine v. Continental Casualty Company, Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman Valentine v. Royal Globe Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Troost v. Estate of DeBoerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Bramalea California, Inc. v. Reliable Interiors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. H.C. Price Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.