Legal Opinion
Bentley v. Fayas
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1951PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
Whether or not a contract was entered into by Reynolds to provide Fayas with insurance, and the terms thereof (if it is found such a contract was made), must be determined from the testimony of Fayas and of one Kossow, an employee of Reynolds, who handled all negotiations with Fayas on behalf of Reynolds. No other witness testified on this issue.
Since 1934 Fayas has been licensed by the public service commission as a contract motor carrier, his license covering the transportation of goods and not passengers. In 1940, Reynolds contracted with Fayas to transport pickers for Reynolds, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bakula v. SchwabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Sandstrom v. Estate of ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Moehlenpah v. MayhewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Brandt v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Franck v. StoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Spurlin v. Paul Brown Agency, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Ritchie v. ClappierCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Campion v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Wojciechowski v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980
- Mid-Century Insurance v. HutselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.