Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Bethea
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 9, 1998No. 7, Sept. Term, 1998Published
1Opinion of the Court
718 A.2d 1187 (1998)
351 Md. 1187
David THOMAS
v.
Marsharina BETHEA.
No. 7, Sept. Term, 1998.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
October 9, 1998.
S. Todd Willson (Jeffrey W. Bredeck, Eccleston and Wolf, on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.
Saul E. Kerpelman, Baltimore, for respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, RAKER, WILNER and CATHELL, JJ.
WILNER, Judge.
In Prande v. Bell, 105 Md.App. 636, 656, 660 A.2d 1055, 1065 (1995), the Court of Special Appeals held that an attorney may be liable for professional malpractice for recommending that a client's case be, or not be, settled…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.