Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Long
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 4. Error from District Court, Grady County; Will Linn, Judge. Action by L. W. Long for damages against the Chicago, R. I. & P. Railway Company for delay in furnishing cars for shipment of live stock. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, C.
This action grows out of the alleged delay of the-carrier in furnishing the plaintiff cars for the shipment of live stock. The plaintiff alleges that on Wednesday afternoon he requested the agent to place ears for loading of stock on the following morning. Later the plaitniff was directed to make the request to the superintendent -of the carrier line. The latter directed the plaintiff to make inquiry of the dispatcher of trains. The plaintiff testified that he was advised by the dispatcher that cars were furnished for movement of live stock from Agawam on Sunday and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ShepardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Duncan v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Ranney-Alton Mercantile Co. v. HanesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Johnston v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.