Johnston v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Phelps county: Ed L. Adams, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, C.
This case is before us a second time. On the former trial, in the district court, the plaintiff recovered a judg*365ment, which was reversed in this court in the case of Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Johnston, 1 Neb. (Unof.) 314. A second trial in the district court resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff prosecuted error. The facts stated in our former opinion, and detailed therein, are presented in the present record, without any essential variance. We therefore, in substance, adopt that statement of the case as follows:
Ezekiel Johnston brought this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bliven Mead v. . Hudson River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Box v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Western Transportation Co. v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Wells v. American Express Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Shellenberg v. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cleve v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Hueston v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Tiller & Smith v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Payne v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Cohn v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.