Legal Opinion

Mason v. Haurand

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 21, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Oil rule io show cause why nonsuit should not be set aside and new trial ordered.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

This ease arises out of the same dispute that gave rise to the litigation in Schorb v. Haurand, 74 Vroom 768, and Haurand v. Schorb, 48 Id. 365. The devolution of tifie, plaintiff's interest as a life tenant in an undivided one-third of certain real estate, and the tenancy thereof by Hanrand, are fully set out in the case first cited, in which a judgment that Carrie L. Schorb, one of the three life tenants, was entitled io recover in ejectment from him. the possession of the premises, was affirmed. Carrie L. Schorb and Mrs. Mason, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Featherstonhaugh v. BradshawNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Francois v. HanffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. Schorb v. HaurandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bancone v. DrovanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Mason v. HaurandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API