Legal Opinion

Bancone v. Drovan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 14, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. The complaint was in two counts. The first claimed in part for use and occupation of the top floor of a house owned by plaintiff’s *199intestate, pursuant to an alleged “agreement” between said intestate and the defendant (which was denied by the answer) and in part for moneys collected by defendant for rent of the remainder of the house, to the use of plaintiff as claimed. The second count was for use and occupation of the entire premises. The counter-claim, but not the answer, set up an agreement by deceased to sell the property to defendant, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Decker v. George W. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  2. Convery v. CongerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  3. Mason v. HaurandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  4. Donovan v. BrenningSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Volk v. Atlantic Acceptance Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  2. Kopitnikoff v. Lowenstein Bros., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API