Legal Opinion

Francois v. Hanff

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 23, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On appeal from District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PARKER, J.

This appeal brings up the judgment in favor of the appellee, plaintiff below, in the District Court of Hoboken for damages to plaintiff’s horse and wagon and harness by reason of a collision with a horse and wagon claimed to have belonged to the defendant. The evidence in the case showed that plaintiff’s horse and wagon were standing in the street alongside the curb when they were run into by another horse and wagon, the latter horse running away, and there being no driver at all in the wagon or anywhere in sight.

The first point urged before…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Breidenbach v. McCormick Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Pincus v. SublettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. Hayes v. MongioviNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  4. Mason v. HaurandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  5. Mason v. HaurandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API