Legal Opinion
McAdam v. United Parcel Service & Helmsman Management Services, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 9, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, J.
[¶ 1] United Parcel Service appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board raising several issues relating to the hearing officer’s grant of Gary McAdam’s petition to fix compensation and the determination of McAdam’s average weekly wage. UPS also appeals from the hearing officer’s decision declining to apportion liability against McAdam’s subsequent employer, the City of Portland. We vacate the decision and remand to the hearing officer for further proceedings.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] Gary McAdam began employment at United Parcel Service in 1987 after a prior…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nielsen v. Burnham & Morrill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Ashby v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Poole v. Statler Tissue Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Johnson v. Shaw's Distribution CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fernald v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Celentano v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005