United States v. Russell Caso, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARLAND, Chief Judge:
Russell James Caso, Jr. is innocent of the crime for which he was charged and convicted. The government does not dispute the point. Nonetheless, Caso was denied an opportunity to collaterally attack his conviction and sentence because he could not demonstrate that he is also innocent of a separate and uncharged offense that has a lower sentencing range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Because Caso was not required to make such a showing, we reverse the order denying his motion to vacate his conviction and sentence.
I
Caso’s conviction arose out of his work for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. HaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- United States v. James Baxter, IICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Lauro Valdez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Eric HicksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. MooreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.