Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John R. Dade
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 2017No. 2016AP002452-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
2Per curiam
The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney John R. Dade have filed a stipulation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12 jointly recommending that Attorney Dade should be publicly reprimanded for professional misconduct. Upon careful review of the matter, we approve the stipulation and publicly reprimand Attorney Dade. We impose no costs.
f 2. Attorney Dade was admitted to the practice of law in Wisconsin on January 11, 1983. Attorney Dade's professional discipline history consists of the following:
a. In September of 1991, Attorney Dade received a private reprimand for failing…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NussbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Patrick J. HudecWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against KremkoskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Clemment (In Re Clemment)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Terry L. ConstantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Terry L. ConstantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022