Legal Opinion
Mattice v. Maryland Casualty Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 17, 1925No. 8619PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). All the authorities agree that the only verdict is that which the jury announces orally to the court, and is received and recorded as the jury’s finding. Kramer v. Kister, 187 Pa. 227, 40 A. 1008, 44 L. R. A. 432; Section 2635, Thompson on Trials; Hyatt on Trials, § 827; Abbott, Trial Briefs, p. 535. While it was agreed between counsel that the jury, when it agreed upon a verdict, shall cause it to be signed by the foreman, and to be sealed, and return to the court at a stated time the determination, such verdict was not finaL
*234Ia Scott v. Scott, 110 Pa. 387,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Humphries v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Stewart v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Martin v. MorelockIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bruce v. Chestnut Farms-Chevy Chase DairyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Sam Fox D/B/A a & M Sales Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Sonville Austin SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Solar v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- State v. GulletteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.