Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Chestnut Farms-Chevy Chase Dairy

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 9, 1942No. 7881PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action begun in the court below for damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of drinking milk from a footle containing splinters of glass. At jjjg conclusion of the trial the jury returned to the ,court room and were asked by the cierk jn tbe presence of the judge and counsel ¡f they bad agTeed upon a verdict. The jury responded “Yes”. Upon being asked what the verdict was, the jury responded, por the defendant”. The clerk then asked, "Is this your verdict, members of the Jury, so say you eacb and all”. The reply was, «Yes”. Thereupon the plaintiff’s attorney asked for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Mattice v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1925

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  3. Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Harrison v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Robert Earl Williams v. United States of America, Gerald Coleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API