Legal Opinion

David Stanley Mack v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1988No. 12-3870PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

David Mack appeals pro se from the district court’s 1 order denying his motion to set aside his guilty plea on the grounds of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and violation of due process. We affirm.

Mack was indicted on one count of armed bank robbery. The indictment charged that Mack took money and blank travelers checks from a bank then insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC) and in so doing, assaulted and endangered the life of a bank employee by use of a gun. Mack pleaded guilty and was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment, to be served consecutively to a sentence he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anthony Hayle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Horace Henry MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Kevin William BeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. Slavek v. HinkleDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  4. United States v. Selena Turner (99-1640) Edward James (99-1762) Kevin Larkins (99-2013)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API