Legal Opinion
United States v. Horace Henry Mathews
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1987No. 86-3867PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Horace Henry Mathews filed a motion to vacate and set aside his sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). The district court treated the matter as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denied it.
On appeal, Mathews challenges the district court’s subject matter jurisdiction; he contends that his guilty plea to a federal charge does not conclusively establish jurisdiction. Mathews also contends that the district court erred in dismissing the motion to set aside his sentence as a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He seeks an order remanding the case for an evidentiary…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Sogomon Akopyan v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Pedro Velasco-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Truman Tolson and Darrell TolsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, Theodore Delusignan, Movant-Appellant v. R.N. Gould, Receiver-TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.