Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Selena Turner (99-1640) Edward James (99-1762) Kevin Larkins (99-2013)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 28, 2001No. 99-1640, 99-1762, 99-2013PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiler, J., joined by Clay, J.,

MOORE, J. (p. 390), delivered a separate concurring opinion.

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Selena Turner and Kevin Larkins appeal their convictions after trial on conspiracy to commit robbery in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. Edward James appeals his § 1951 conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to the conspiracy charge. For the reasons stated hereafter, we REVERSE Turner’s and Larkins’s convictions and AFFIRM James’s conviction and sentence.

I. BACKGROUND

This case arises from a conspiracy by three Detroit police officers, James, Lar-kins, and Vernon Gentry,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. UrbanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. James R. Downing, Samuel Ward, Daniel DruckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Philip A. ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Manila VichitvongsaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API