Van Gordon v. Beaver
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon Plaintiffs objections to United States Magistrate Judge Erickson’s Report and Recommendation dated February 14,1996.
Pursuant to statute, the court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.1(c). Based on that review and all the arguments of the parties, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Clerk Doc. No. 12).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. DefendantyThird-Party Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiffs damages claim is accordingly limited…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Kenneth D. Allison v. Flexway Trucking, Inc. And Mark A. StuckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the State Bank of Greenwald, Minnesota v. Douglas A. Winter Bernadine Winter Robert J. OsendorfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sayre v. McGOUGH CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Sayre v. McGOUGH CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Sayre v. McGOUGH CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998