Legal Opinion
Hackett v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1987No. 86-6081PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner, Ronald J. Hackett, appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner filed his pro se petition seeking to challenge the presumptive parole date imposed by the United States Parole Commission. Petitioner contends that the Commission improperly set the release date outside the range established under the recommended parole guidelines and that the Commission erred by relying on evidence which was not produced at trial and was specifically rejected by the sentencing judge. In addition, petitioner argues that he is entitled to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ramesh Solomon v. Robert I. Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Robert Louis Farkas v. United States of America, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Harold Martin Brest v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Director, Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Spring-Field, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Carmine Romano v. Dennis Luther, Warden, and Benjamin F. Baer, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Paul Fazzini v. Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, Warden, United States Marshals Service, and United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Kennedy v. AlleraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Dietz v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Durham v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Gates-Bey v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.