Legal Opinion
Adamson v. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 16, 2006No. Civil Action 06-866 (FLW)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Ortho McNeil”) and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Watson”). In February 2006, Plaintiff, Lindsay Adamson (“Adamson”), filed the instant complaint alleging that Defendants intentionally misrepresented and concealed from Plaintiff and other “brand loyalists” that Ortho Tri-Cyclen and TriNessa are identical drugs. Thus, Plaintiff contends that she and other brand loyalists overpaid for Ortho Tri-Cyclen because TriNessa, the identical drug, was available at a reduced…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hassler v. Sovereign BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Salvio v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Prohias v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- Dessert Beauty, Inc. v. Platinum Funding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Yingst v. Novartis AGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.