Legal Opinion
Yingst v. Novartis AG
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-7919PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
CECCHI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court upon motion of Defendant Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. (“Defendant”) to dismiss Plaintiff Kerri Yingst’s (“Plaintiff’) complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). [ECF No. 13.] Plaintiff opposes the motion. [ECF No. 25.] The motion is decided without oral argument pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is granted.
II. BACKGROUND
In October 2013, Plaintiff purchased Excedrin Migraine in Cherry Hill, New Jersey in order to relieve her migraines. (Compl. ¶ 20.)'…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- BENJAMIN MOORE & CO. v. B.M. MEDITERRANEAN S.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- FAISON v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- FAISON v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- NORTH v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- SWIFT v. PANDEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.