Etz v. Mamerow
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Justice.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court and from an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.
The cause was tried to the court without a jury upon a complaint to quiet title which must be construed under the evidence presented by plaintiff-appellee as being intended to state a claim of title by adverse possession against defendants-appellants to a strip of land three feet wide lying north of the north boundary line of Lot 10, Norma Place in Phoenix. The parties will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff and defendants as they appeared in the trial court.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Langazo v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Callan v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Larue v. KosichArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Wessels v. ColebankIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Pinkerton v. PritchardArizona Supreme Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ammer v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Deseret Livestock Co. v. SharpUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Hunt v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Inch v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Siler v. Arizona Department of Real EstateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.