Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Nunns

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1913No. 7840PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Garfield District Court. — Hon. John T. Shumate, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This action was to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff. claimed a lien in the sum of $413.70 for work and labor performed in the construction of defendant’s dwelling. This included the assigned claim of $34.50 of another laborer upon the same building, but the same state of facts exists as to both. The court sustained the claim of lien and ordered foreclosure. The errors alleged are:

“(a) Plaintiff’s action was not commenced within six months after the completion of the building;(b) Plaintiff’s lien claim statement was not filed in the office of the county clerk and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Lichty v. Houston Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Curtis v. McCarthySupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fisher v. McPhee & McGinnity Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Weather Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Pinon Springs Condominiums, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Armour & Co. v. McPhee & McGinnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Great Western Sugar Co. v. F. H. Gilcrest Lumber Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. WB BARR LUMBER COMPANY v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API