Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. McPhee & McGinnity Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 18, 1929No. 12,053PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The action is to enforce a lien which subdivision II of chapter 143, C. L. 1921, gives to mechanics and others. It was brought by McPhee & McGKnnity, material men, against Armour & Company, a Delaware corporation, owner of the premises on which a hog cooler building was erected for it by Patrick J. Sullivan, principal contractor, under a written contract between them; and, as there was a mortgage on the premises, the mortgagees were joined as defendants. There were other claimants of liens and they were made codefendants, so that all interested parties might be, as they were, heard and their…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Jones v. Great Southern Fireproof Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  4. Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bird v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hayutin v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Kobayashi v. Meehleis Steel Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. POPE HEAT. & AIR CON. CO. v. Garrett-Bromfield Mtg. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Armour & Co. of Delaware v. McPhee & McGinnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  5. Lewis v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API