Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Chicago Railways Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1922No. 14381PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jacob H. Hopkins, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone

Appellant, as administrator, brought suit against appellee to recover for the death of William E. Ford, who was killed November 12, 1913. The action in this case was brought July 23, 1920, under the provisions of section 2 of the act of 1873, entitled “An act to amend an act in regard to limitations.” (Hurd’s Stat. 1921, p. 2014.) Appellant had in December, 1913, begun an action against appellee for the death of Ford, and in his declaration made averments showing that the deceased and the appellee were working under and subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation act, making no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Cant v. CrossleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hartray v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Handtoffski v. Chicago Consolidated Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Prouty v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Crane v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Clarke v. StorchakIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wilson v. TromlyIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Roth v. Northern Assurance Co. Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Metropolitan Trust Co. v. Bowman Dairy Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1938
  5. The People v. MonroeIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API