Legal Opinion

Roth v. Northern Assurance Co. Ltd.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1964No. 38537PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

This case involves the construction and application of section 24 of the Limitations Act which provides .that “if the plaintiff be nonsuited,” and the time limited for bringing the action has run during the pendency of the action in which the nonsuit was entered, the plaintiff may commence a new action within one year. (Ill. Rev. Stat: 1963, chap. 83, par. 24a.) The circuit court of Cook County held that section 24 does not apply to a new action to recover upon fire insurance policies, commenced within one year after the original action, brought in a federal district court, had been dismissed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Franzese v. TrinkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Moore v. Jewel Tea Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Baird & Warner, Inc. v. Addison Industrial Park, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. People Ex Rel. Cason v. RingIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hupp v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1978

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API