Legal Opinion

Hartray v. Chicago Railways Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1919No. 12312PublishedCited by 62 opinions

Writ of Error, to the Appellate Court for the First District; — heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

This cause comes to this court by writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court for the First District to review a judgment of that court reversing a judgment of the superior court in an action on the case instituted by William C. Hartray, as administrator of the estate of Frank Jagielski, deceased, against the Chicago Railways Company to recover damages for the death of said Jagielski.

This suit was brought November 28, 1910, and the declaration alleged that the injury resulting in death occurred June 27, 1909. The declaration contains no allegation that the action was commenced within one year…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Chandler v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Sargent Co. v. BaublisIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Demartino v. SiemonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Martin v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Williams v. ManchesterIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Wilson v. TromlyIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Froud v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lowrey v. MalkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1960

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API