Legal Opinion

In Re Hampton

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 5, 1987No. 19-60044PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HENRY L. HESS, Jr., Chief Judge.

On March 5, 1987, the court entered an order denying confirmation of the debtors’ plan for the reason that the debtors do not qualify for relief under Chapter 12 of Title 11, U.S.C. This memorandum opinion will set forth the reasons for the order denying confirmation.

At the confirmation hearing, various objections were raised by the Oregon Department of Veterans Affairs (ODVA), a creditor holding a secured claim. Among these objections was an objection that the debtors were not qualified for relief under Chapter 12. The court stated that it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Dakota Lay'd EggsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1986
  2. In Re HinesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1980
  3. Armstrong v. Corn Belt BankDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. Lindsay v. U.S. Bank (In Re Lindsay)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1983
  5. Matter of MyersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Sugar Pine RanchUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1989
  2. In Re AldersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1990
  3. In re CarterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API