Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1955 Buick Century Coupe

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 26, 1956No. 3222PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

This is a forfeiture proceeding under the provisions of § 7301(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 7301. Forfeiture is not contested and the question is whether the petitioner, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, a finance company having accepted an assignment of a conditional sales contract at the time of purchase, is entitled to remission or mitigation to the extent of its interest pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3617 (b).

It is conceded that, at and before the finance company acquired its interest in the conditional sales contract, it made no inquiry as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ONE HUDSON COUPE, 1938 MODEL, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. One 1939 Model De Soto Coupe, Motor No. S6-27,687Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. Interstate Securities Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. United States v. National Discount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  5. One 1951 Chevrolet Pickup Truck, Motor No. Jba504187 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. CafourekMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. United States of America v. $909,708.64 in U.S. Currency, Seized from a Subledger at Citibank, N.A., Previously Held in Account Ending in 7108, in the Name of NTGH 2A Auto Trade Inc., LLC, et al.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API