Legal Opinion

Hasty v. Rent-A-Driver, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1984PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

I

This is a contract action involving the validity in an employment contract of a covenant not to compete. After the em ployee brought suit against the employer, the employer counterclaimed alleging that the employee had breached a non-competition covenant. The employer did not request injunctive relief, but sought damages only. The Chancellor found that the covenant was void as an unreasonable restriction on trade, and dismissed the counterclaim. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding the covenant to be reasonable and awarding the employer damages for breach of contract.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. All Stainless, Inc. v. ColbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Allright Auto Parks, Inc. v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Club Aluminum Co. v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Hospital Consultants, Inc. v. PotykaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Vantage Technology, LLC v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. v. UdomTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Heyer-Jordan & Associates, Inc. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  4. Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. MascariCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Hapney v. Central Garage, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API