Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 13, 2004No. 21986-1-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sweeney, A.C.J.

By court rule a criminal defendant in custody must be brought to trial within 60 days of arraignment. But the speedy trial time is tolled for competency or sanity evaluations. Former CrR 3.3(g)(1) (2001). Here, the court ordered a competency evaluation on Francis Harris’s motion. And as part of that procedure, the defense signed an order tolling the speedy trial rule. Mr. Harris unequivocally waived his right to a speedy trial on several other occasions during the course of these proceedings. Any delay between his arraignment and trial was, therefore, tolled. We affirm the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. CarlyleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. State Of Washington v. Sergey FedorukCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. State Of Washington v. Kenneth Allen ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State Of Washington v. Sergey FedorukCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API