State v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
94 P.3d 379 (2004)
122 Wash.App. 498
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Francis Tye HARRIS, Appellant.
No. 21986-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Six.
July 13, 2004.
Dennis W. Morgan, Attorney at Law, Ritzville, WA, for Appellant.
Paige L. Sully, Attorney at Law, Pasco, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, A.C.J.
By court rule a criminal defendant in custody must be brought to trial within 60 days of arraignment. But the speedy trial time is tolled for competency or sanity evaluations. Former CrR 3.3(g)(1) (2001). Here, the court ordered a competency evaluation on Francis Harris's…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. CarlyleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State Of Washington v. Sergey FedorukCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Kenneth Allen ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State Of Washington v. Sergey FedorukCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington, V Richard Carl Howard, IiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.