Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Neal
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 11, 2000No. 99-103Published
1Opinion of the Court
16 S.W.3d 228 (2000)
341 Ark. 228
Jimmie L. WILSON
v.
James A. NEAL.
No. 99-103.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
May 11, 2000.
George Hairston, New York, NY; Roy C. Lewellen, Marianna; and Wilson & Valley, by: E. Dion Wilson, Helena, for appellant.
Robert J. Donovan, Marianna, for appellee.
ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice.
This case involves the discipline of an attorney, appellant Jimmie L. Wilson, where a majority of justices has been unable to agree on a single ground for reversal on the core issue of the proper sanction. Thus, the decision of the circuit judge is affirmed, and the opinions of this court have no…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Munson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- James A. Neal v. Jimmie L. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Wilson v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Carton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.