Legal Opinion
Gayle v. Johnson
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-2806 (FLW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFSON, District Judge:
On August 5, 2013, putative class representatives Garfield O. Gayle (“Gayle”), Ne-ville Sukhu (“Sukhu”), and Sheldon Francois (“Francois”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Named Plaintiffs”) filed their third amended class-action complaint (“TAC”) against various federal and state government defendants2 (collectively, the “Government”), alleging violations of the Immigration and Naturalization Act (“INA”) and the due process clause of the United States Constitution. Specifically, Plaintiffs claim that they and other similarly situated individuals in the District of New…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gayle v. Warden Monmouth County Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Young v. AvilesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Gordon v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Gayle v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- GAYLE v. ELWOODDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019