Legal Opinion
Gayle v. Johnson
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 28, 2015No. Civil Action No. 12-2806 FLWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge:
This putative class action challenges the constitutionality of detention procedures related to mandatory detention of aliens under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c), codified as the' Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). Putative class representatives Garfield O. Gayle (“Gayle”) and Neville Sukhu (“Suk-hu”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Named Plaintiffs”) aver that they and other similarly situated individuals in New Jersey have been subjected to unconstitutional mandatory immigration detention under § 1226(c) by the United States Department of Homeland Security,…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gayle v. Warden Monmouth County Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- GAYLE v. ELWOODDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Gudino v. LoweDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Kleiber Alexander Arias Gudino v. Craig Lowe, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026