Legal Opinion
Musquiz v. Harris County Flood Control District
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided December 4, 2000No. 01-99-01295-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
ADELE HEDGES, Justice.
We deny the motions for rehearing and for en bane consideration filed by the Harris County Flood Control District (the District). Our opinion of July 20, 2000, is withdrawn and the following is substituted in its place. Our judgment of July 20, 2000, remains unchanged.
Alice Musquiz files a restricted appeal from the trial court’s judgment reinstating the special commissioners’ award in a condemnation proceeding. We vacate that judgment and hold that a prior order dismissing the cause of action for want of prosecution was the final judgment in this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pearson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Denton County v. BrammerTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Nueces County Housing Assistance, Inc. v. M & M Resources Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- State v. Carlton, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Seals v. Upper Trinity Regional Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- in the Interest of P. RJ E.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- City of Tyler v. Beck, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
- Charles C. Laidley and Dorothy Laidley v. City of San Marcos, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Charles C. Laidley and Dorothy Laidley v. City of San Marcos, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.