Legal Opinion

Nueces County Housing Assistance, Inc. v. M & M Resources Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 18, 1991No. 13-90-139-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

Appeal is taken by writ of error from the granting of a “no-answer” default judgment against the petitioner, Nueces County Housing Assistance, Inc. (NCHA). The trial court’s judgment awards respondent, M & M Resources (M & M), actual and exemplary damages for NCHA’s alleged breach of contract, libel, and tortious interference with contract. Because we conclude that the citation will not support the judgment, we reverse and remand.

To successfully attack a default judgment by writ of error, the petitioner must (1) file the writ within six months after the final judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Stubbs v. StubbsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Finlay v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Lawyers Lloyds v. WebbTexas Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Canal Insurance Co. v. Hopkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
  2. Carmona v. Bunzl Distribution, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. Frazier v. Dikovitsky, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. Ramirez v. Lyford Consolidated Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  5. Midstate Environmental Services, LP v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API