Vandiford v. . Vandiford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It is apparent from a perusal of tbe record that tbe last three issues were answered without regard to tbe pleadings, tbe evidence, tbe contentions of tbe parties, or tbe charge of tbe court. May-bap tbe jury undertook to compromise tbe case. Bartholomew v. Parrish, 186 N. C., 81, 118 S. E., 899; Gulley v. Raynor, 185 N. C., 96, 116 S. E., 171.
Tbe defendant contended from the evidence that tbe 7th issue should be answered in tbe sum of $16,348.40; while tbe plaintiff contended that it should be answered in tbe sum of $8,665.44. Tbe court instructed tbe jury to answer tbe issue accordingly as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jordan v. . FarthingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Bartholomew & Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Daniel v. Town of BelhavenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Gulley v. . RaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Nall v. . McMathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. MatthisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- City of Burlington v. StaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985