Legal Opinion

Scofield v. Clarke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1914No. Docket No. 121PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Case by George J. Scofield against William R. Clarke and others for fraud and conspiracy. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.

Plaintiff, for himself and as assignee for several others, recovered a judgment against all of the defendants in an action of assumpsit under section 10421, 3 Comp. Laws (5 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] § 13954). The appellants have brought the case before this court for review upon writ of error. The declaration in the case was in assumpsit under the statute quoted. It contained three counts, and was intended to charge fraudulent conduct on the part of defendant Andre, operating under the name and style of the Grand Ledge Cold Storage Company, and the appellants, whereby plaintiff and his assignors…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDonald v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Bush v. SpragueMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Parker v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Ross v. MinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Schwab v. MableyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roche v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Earp v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Auto Workers' Temple Ass'n v. JansonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Roberts v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Kunzig v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API